Articles Finance

The Fish That Can Save Japan’s Economy

Share

Financial Times May 14th 2012

What ever happened to the Japanese debt nightmare?

Early last year no less a figure than Kaoru Yosano, then minister for economic and fiscal policy,  warned of “a dreadful dream” in which long-term interest rates would shoot up.

S&P had just downgraded Japan’s credit rating, and high-profile hedge funds were anticipating a bond market bloodbath. Given Japan’s gaping fiscal deficit and Mount Fuji-sized government debt burden, shorting ten year bonds trading at the extraordinarily low yields of 1.2% looked like a one way bet.

Except that it wasn’t. Fast forward sixteen months, and ten year bond prices have risen further, causing yields to drop to 0.85%. The entire yield curve out to thirty years has now slid below 2%. While the bond market vigilantes are causing uproar in the eurozone periphery, in Japan they appear to have gone as quiet as the sound of one hand clapping.

The reality is that the world’s bond markets are delivering two radically different types of bad news.

The first type, peculiar to eurozone countries with current account deficits, comes via excessively high bond yields. The message is a loss of faith in these countries’ ability to service their debts to foreigners.

The second type comes via excessively low bond yields and the message is a loss of confidence in growth prospects. Japan is the most extreme case, but no longer unique. The high bond prices and low yields visible across the developed world are no badge of honour for policy-makers, but a warning sign that economies are sinking into a morass of weak growth and joblessness.

The fact that Japan’s bull market in government bonds is still intact twenty two years after its asset bubble burst should set red lights flashing elsewhere. In an era of stagnation, time passing does not indicate progress, but merely the hardening of pessimistic expectations.

At first sight the co-existence of a soaring debt-to-GDP ratio and rock-bottom interest rates seems anomalous, but they are two sides of the same coin. What causes them both is economic debility.

The key factor in Japan’s fiscal deficits had been the long slup in central government tax revenues, which have halved since 1990. Large numbers of workers have seen their pay fall below the income tax threshold. Corporate tax revenues have been hit by loss carry-forwards and carry-backs. The long slide in land prices has eaten into inheritance taxes and made capital gains a distant memory.

Prime Minister Noda plans to deal with the government deficit by doubling the consumption tax to 10%, a long-standing goal of the Ministry of Finance. But if you tax something, you usually end up with less of it, and Japan needs to encourage, not penalize consumption. Instead, the government should consider taxing savings, particularly the 300 trillion yen of deposits and long-term investments sitting on corporate balance sheets.

It should also take advantage of what the bond market is offering. Instead of a dreadful dream, Japan’s policy-makers are facing a golden opportunity. They can issue debt on more favourable terms than any borrower in history.

Reportedly the British Treasury is considering the issuance of “Osborne bonds”, nicknamed after the British Chancellor of the Exchequer. These would have maturities of a hundred years or more or perhaps no maturity at all, like the perpetuals floated to fund various British wars.

The Japanese government should beat George Osborne to the punch. Prime Minister Noda has likened himself to the unglamorous, but hardy loach-fish. Super-long maturity or perpetual “loach bonds” could probably be floated with coupons of under 2.5%.

In the west loaches are rarely eaten, but in Japan they are considered solid fare and served up fried or marinated in sake. Likewise, loach bonds might not attract foreign investors, but Japanese insurance companies and other yield-starved institutions should have an appetite for the extra income in their home currency.

Currently Japanese bond yields exceed the growth of nominal GDP. If this gap is not reversed, the debt-to-GDP ratio will carry on rising for ever. The gap is modest and can be addressed by sensible stimulus and aggressive monetary policy.

The US, the UK and the strong credits of the eurozone are in better positions, but need to ensure that growth does not slow any further

The outlook is much bleaker for the weaker credits of the eurozone (not just Greece) where bond yields are likely to remain locked far above the growth rate. For them Mr. Yosano’s nightmare is all too real.

 

Categories

Articles
Finance

2 Comments

  • Jonathan says:

    If we follow long-term cycles in interest rate we should be developing a bottom to start a stable rise for the next 30-40 years (similar from 1940-1980), under which economical/financial/monetary scenario shall we think this could happen? What would happen when these massive amounts of money leave the bond market? Where will they go? Commodities, Equities? What will be the impact on those markets?

  • Renato M says:

    Dear Peter,

    Perhaps contemporary financial problems deserve innovative (er… extreme) solutions in order to achieve success.

    Negative real interest rates have been around for a while. But the idea of negative “nominal” rates is very much a policy option. You mentioned it in your excellent manga, but via taxation. Now, just a couple of weeks ago, Denmark’s Central Bank hinted that negative nominal rates are very much a policy option.

    Of course, people that only think inside the box say that “monetary policy has lost its power because rates cannot go lower than zero”. Well, they surely can. There is no universal rule that prohibits exiting the realm of natural (>= 0) numbers when setting rates.

    For aging countries like Japan, one of the few fiscal measures that they can rely on is a tax hike. Not sales a tax, and I completely agree with you on that. But inheritance/estate taxes.

    Sounds awful, but I think that a secular problem like Japan’s can only be solved by taxing close to 100% of a person’s assets at time of death because:

    1) Small families pehaps limit social upheaval.
    2) It would motivate present consumption among among mostly frugal seniors.
    3) It would make government debt largely go away in hand with population decrease, considering that Japanese citizens and/or their banks are the main owners of JGB’s.

    It is the only way to come up to terms with the demographic drama in Japan. It is the equivalent of a nation saying “well folks, we had a great handful of decades, but now we have to face the music; give me back those JGB’s, let’s get them off the government’s liability side and you can glide off to eternity”. This fiscal euthanasia is not too different from the one mentioned in the manga….

    By no means this is a socialist/communist measure. It is in fact cold realism. The generations that lived the dream must carry the cost of ending the illusion. The culprits? Well, the usual bad guys: politicians and bureucrats that fueled an unreachable utopia of social well-being.

    Extreme? Sure thing. As extreme as 200% debt/GDP, 50% of government spending financed by debt and -0.1% population growth.

    Best regards from São Paulo,

    Renato M